Citywide internet could offer an economic boost
City’s and towns across the country are starting to offer citywide wireless internet as an economic development tool. While Coles County has several wi-fi hot spots, we are way off from full coverage.
Both Mattoon and Charleston could benefit from such an incentive. This would be highly popular on Charleston’s heavy business oriented square. And Mattoon is trying to attract new business. Such a feature could help improve that effort.
Before long, this will be expected for a downtown business district. Coles County should take a step up and offer it while it is still considered an advantage.
The service is made available by placing wireless antennas a top power polls and buildings. Those antennas would then be connected to the internet. Each hub has a range of up to 1000 feet. A hub would be placed about every two to three blocks to insure coverage.
Some cities are offering the service for completely free as an economic development tool. Some are offering the service for free but users are subject to advertisements from the provider. And some are offering pay subscriptions as an alternative to DSL, Cable or other broadband services.
City-wide wireless internet is not without its risks. Studies show that while growth of public Wi-Fi usage was up a full 43 percent from 2004 to 2005, 58 percent of people will only use it if the connection is free. Why pay for the cow if the milk is free?
And the frequency used for this is the same as many wireless phones. The frequency is getting crowded and subject to interference. And as with any new technology, security is also a worry. But proper software and firewalls will protect from most security concerns.
But it is far cheaper than running fiber optic cable to every structure in the city. To run fiber-optic lines directly to every home and business, which will increase broadband capacities well beyond those available from cable-modem and DSL service today. would cost about $2,000 to $3,000 per household to run fiber, wireless can be deployed for about $20 to $25 per household
Philadelphia has become the poster child for citywide internet access. They plan to serve their 590,000 households with wireless service by years end. Tempe, Arizona; Grand Rapids, Michigan; Salt Lake City, Utah; Spokane, Washington; have all ventured into providing their cities with wireless internet. And the list of cities offering this is quickly growing.
Smaller cities are beginning to follow. Coles County is home to the 17th largest phone company in the nation. We should play on our communications background and offer citywide wireless internet to our citizens.
Both Mattoon and Charleston could benefit from such an incentive. This would be highly popular on Charleston’s heavy business oriented square. And Mattoon is trying to attract new business. Such a feature could help improve that effort.
Before long, this will be expected for a downtown business district. Coles County should take a step up and offer it while it is still considered an advantage.
The service is made available by placing wireless antennas a top power polls and buildings. Those antennas would then be connected to the internet. Each hub has a range of up to 1000 feet. A hub would be placed about every two to three blocks to insure coverage.
Some cities are offering the service for completely free as an economic development tool. Some are offering the service for free but users are subject to advertisements from the provider. And some are offering pay subscriptions as an alternative to DSL, Cable or other broadband services.
City-wide wireless internet is not without its risks. Studies show that while growth of public Wi-Fi usage was up a full 43 percent from 2004 to 2005, 58 percent of people will only use it if the connection is free. Why pay for the cow if the milk is free?
And the frequency used for this is the same as many wireless phones. The frequency is getting crowded and subject to interference. And as with any new technology, security is also a worry. But proper software and firewalls will protect from most security concerns.
But it is far cheaper than running fiber optic cable to every structure in the city. To run fiber-optic lines directly to every home and business, which will increase broadband capacities well beyond those available from cable-modem and DSL service today. would cost about $2,000 to $3,000 per household to run fiber, wireless can be deployed for about $20 to $25 per household
Philadelphia has become the poster child for citywide internet access. They plan to serve their 590,000 households with wireless service by years end. Tempe, Arizona; Grand Rapids, Michigan; Salt Lake City, Utah; Spokane, Washington; have all ventured into providing their cities with wireless internet. And the list of cities offering this is quickly growing.
Smaller cities are beginning to follow. Coles County is home to the 17th largest phone company in the nation. We should play on our communications background and offer citywide wireless internet to our citizens.
