No relaxing on the FutureGen proposal
We’ll we made it past phase one in the FutureGen playoffs. Now it is time to focus on phase two. Mattoon scored impressively on the site requirements for the project, but the fight is not over yet.
I’ve been watching the process pretty closely and I have been quite impressed with the proposal Mattoon has put together. And local authorities involved in the process have been very helpful in answering questions. David Wortman, Angela Griffin and Chapin Rose have all been a tremendous help.
But it is not guaranteed the plant will be built here yet. We are one in four possible choices. Now is the time to reevaluate our proposal and double our efforts to bring the plant.
The sites were scored based on surface conditions (availability of cooling water, power grid, site topography, etc.) and subsurface conditions (geology, faults, etc.) The Mattoon site scored second in both areas, behind Jewett, Texas on surface conditions and Odessa, Texas on subsurface conditions.
The good news is Mattoon scored very high in categories we can’t change, such as rock formations and fault lines. And lower in categories we have some control over, such as power grid infrastructure and access to nearby grounds for monitoring.
Upgrades to the power grid and negotiations with landowners for monitoring access can fill the needed gap to move Mattoon ahead of the Texas sites. We lost 40 points to land access. This one category could put us in the lead.
There will be other factors in the final choice that were not included in the first phase of the decision making process. It will probably be these factors that make or break the deal.
Both states have been touting their access and availability to coal. But the alliance has stated that the plant will be using coal from various places around the country and even around the world so this is not as important as it seems on the surface.
The Illinois sites are relatively close to the Illinois Coal Research facility at Southern Illinois University. Since FutureGen is also a research facility, this proximity could work to Mattoon’s advantage. Perhaps Lake Land could begin some kind of coal research. However, the University of Texas coal research facility is about the same distance to the Jewett, Texas site.
One of the biggest advantages that the Texas sites currently have over the Illinois sites is that the State of Texas has agreed to take ownership of the CO2 created from the plant and indemnifying the Alliance from the CO2. The proposal evaluation report released by the FutureGen Alliance states that this was a contribution factor to choosing the Texas sites.
Illinois passing similar legislation will go a long way to leveling the playing field. State Representative, Chapin Rose assured me that if it came down that close, Illinois would do what it could to match the Texas deal. U.S. Representatives, Tim Johnson and John Shimkus, and Jerry Costello are working at the federal level to see if something can be done about the CO2 liability. I want to keep pressure on the politicians to make sure Illinois is keeping up with Texas. I would hate to hear "the sites were real close, but since Texas agreed to take ownership of the CO2...."
Overall, it looks as though Mattoon is in decent shape for getting the FutureGen power plant. But now is not the time to wait and see. Now is the time to double the efforts and don’t give up on the fight. We can do this, but it will have to be a real community effort.
I’ve been watching the process pretty closely and I have been quite impressed with the proposal Mattoon has put together. And local authorities involved in the process have been very helpful in answering questions. David Wortman, Angela Griffin and Chapin Rose have all been a tremendous help.
But it is not guaranteed the plant will be built here yet. We are one in four possible choices. Now is the time to reevaluate our proposal and double our efforts to bring the plant.
The sites were scored based on surface conditions (availability of cooling water, power grid, site topography, etc.) and subsurface conditions (geology, faults, etc.) The Mattoon site scored second in both areas, behind Jewett, Texas on surface conditions and Odessa, Texas on subsurface conditions.
The good news is Mattoon scored very high in categories we can’t change, such as rock formations and fault lines. And lower in categories we have some control over, such as power grid infrastructure and access to nearby grounds for monitoring.
Upgrades to the power grid and negotiations with landowners for monitoring access can fill the needed gap to move Mattoon ahead of the Texas sites. We lost 40 points to land access. This one category could put us in the lead.
There will be other factors in the final choice that were not included in the first phase of the decision making process. It will probably be these factors that make or break the deal.
Both states have been touting their access and availability to coal. But the alliance has stated that the plant will be using coal from various places around the country and even around the world so this is not as important as it seems on the surface.
The Illinois sites are relatively close to the Illinois Coal Research facility at Southern Illinois University. Since FutureGen is also a research facility, this proximity could work to Mattoon’s advantage. Perhaps Lake Land could begin some kind of coal research. However, the University of Texas coal research facility is about the same distance to the Jewett, Texas site.
One of the biggest advantages that the Texas sites currently have over the Illinois sites is that the State of Texas has agreed to take ownership of the CO2 created from the plant and indemnifying the Alliance from the CO2. The proposal evaluation report released by the FutureGen Alliance states that this was a contribution factor to choosing the Texas sites.
Illinois passing similar legislation will go a long way to leveling the playing field. State Representative, Chapin Rose assured me that if it came down that close, Illinois would do what it could to match the Texas deal. U.S. Representatives, Tim Johnson and John Shimkus, and Jerry Costello are working at the federal level to see if something can be done about the CO2 liability. I want to keep pressure on the politicians to make sure Illinois is keeping up with Texas. I would hate to hear "the sites were real close, but since Texas agreed to take ownership of the CO2...."
Overall, it looks as though Mattoon is in decent shape for getting the FutureGen power plant. But now is not the time to wait and see. Now is the time to double the efforts and don’t give up on the fight. We can do this, but it will have to be a real community effort.

