Keep the entry age at 21
The City of Charleston police department recently arrested 88 patrons of Jerry’s Pub for underage entry into a tavern. 77 of them were arrested for underage drinking. This phenomenon is no stranger to Charleston, but this was the most ever caught at one time.
The incident has once again spurred the debate of entry age into Charleston bars. Throughout the 1980’s and the part of the 1990’s, the entry age was 19, however you were not supposed to be able to consume alcohol until you were 21. It was very easy to obtain alcohol on inside, prompting the city to raise the age to 21, the legal drinking age.
The argument that you’re old enough to vote or fight for your country, but not have a drink; or there are plenty of people over the age of 21 that are not mature enough to drink while some younger are, is fine. It is a good healthy debate with valid points on both sides. But these are NOT arguments on why Charleston should allow 19 year olds into their bars.
The state law is no one under 21 is allowed to drink. It is the City of Charleston’s duty to uphold the laws of the state. They are not a higher authority and can pick and choose which state laws they get to abide.
Teens’ driving to Champaign to drink is also not a valid argument to lower the entry age. The more places that allow underage patrons in their establishment, the more underage drinkers there will be. For years the entry age in Charleston was 19. 19 and 20 year olds from all over the area flocked to Charleston to take advantage.
In addition to the EIU students, the bars saw young visitors from Sullivan to Paris, and from Effingham to Arcola and beyond. The numbers driving to Champaign are far less then the numbers that were in Charleston bars.
Lowering the entry age to reduce the number of house parties is a horrible argument. This is almost an admission you are going to allow underage drinking in your town. If the house parties are full of law abiding 19 & 20 year olds, they aren't the ones causing trouble.
How do you word that on the ordinance? We have a problem with underage drinkers at house parties so we are going to let them in our bars? Now to state the obvious, what does it matter what the entry age is? It is 21 now and 77 underage patrons were sipping away at Jerry's.
The state law in Illinois is no one under 21 is allowed to consume alcohol. It is the City of Charleston’s job to enforce the law. Allowing 19 year olds into the bars flies in the face of this law. It has been tried and failed. Of course entry seems to have little meaning to some bar owners as 77 underage drinker were found in one establishment at one time.
The incident has once again spurred the debate of entry age into Charleston bars. Throughout the 1980’s and the part of the 1990’s, the entry age was 19, however you were not supposed to be able to consume alcohol until you were 21. It was very easy to obtain alcohol on inside, prompting the city to raise the age to 21, the legal drinking age.
The argument that you’re old enough to vote or fight for your country, but not have a drink; or there are plenty of people over the age of 21 that are not mature enough to drink while some younger are, is fine. It is a good healthy debate with valid points on both sides. But these are NOT arguments on why Charleston should allow 19 year olds into their bars.
The state law is no one under 21 is allowed to drink. It is the City of Charleston’s duty to uphold the laws of the state. They are not a higher authority and can pick and choose which state laws they get to abide.
Teens’ driving to Champaign to drink is also not a valid argument to lower the entry age. The more places that allow underage patrons in their establishment, the more underage drinkers there will be. For years the entry age in Charleston was 19. 19 and 20 year olds from all over the area flocked to Charleston to take advantage.
In addition to the EIU students, the bars saw young visitors from Sullivan to Paris, and from Effingham to Arcola and beyond. The numbers driving to Champaign are far less then the numbers that were in Charleston bars.
Lowering the entry age to reduce the number of house parties is a horrible argument. This is almost an admission you are going to allow underage drinking in your town. If the house parties are full of law abiding 19 & 20 year olds, they aren't the ones causing trouble.
How do you word that on the ordinance? We have a problem with underage drinkers at house parties so we are going to let them in our bars? Now to state the obvious, what does it matter what the entry age is? It is 21 now and 77 underage patrons were sipping away at Jerry's.
The state law in Illinois is no one under 21 is allowed to consume alcohol. It is the City of Charleston’s job to enforce the law. Allowing 19 year olds into the bars flies in the face of this law. It has been tried and failed. Of course entry seems to have little meaning to some bar owners as 77 underage drinker were found in one establishment at one time.
