The new SBLHC smoking policy
Sarah Bush Lincoln Health Center recently announced it’s new no smoking policy for its patients and employees. There will be no smoking on Sarah Bush property; not in the building, not in the vestibule and not even in the parking lot. I am not sure how they will enforce this policy, but it is the one that is on the books and will be in effect January 1.
Probably the most controversial portion of the policy is that employees are not allowed to smoke in their own vehicles even if they are not on Sarah Bush property if they are on the clock for Sarah Bush.
On the surface this sounds extreme. Again, I am not sure how it will be enforced. But they are basically saying is that if you are on our time, you will not smoke. We are not paying our employees to smoke. When I look at it that way, I don’t see it as so controversial.
As I’ve said before, I am not a fan of smoking, but I am not a fan anti-smoking law either; though I wouldn’t fight against one. But this is a company policy, not a government imposed law. I have said in the past, the place to take the no-smoking argument is to the private business, owner, or company; not the government. Let the individual company decide how they want to run their business. Sarah Bush is a private company setting policy for their employees. If the employees don’t like it, they can search elsewhere for a job.
One under-reported portion of this policy is that SBL is offering its employees assistance in quitting smoking. This seems to be helping ease the extreme non-smoking policy. From what I’ve heard, these incentives go far beyond moral support and group therapy. It is a real financial benefit for the employee.
I am sure there is a financial benefit in it for Sarah Bush as well. The fewer smokers on the payroll, the less health insurance costs are to the company. That savings is shared by both the employees with their health insurance match and the patients in the possibility of lower charges.
A hospital is supposed to be a clean place. When its employees smell like ashtrays, it really detracts from the clean image. I think that is one of the goals of this policy. Again, I don’t see how they will be able to truly enforce every aspect of the rule. But it is a step in the right direction.
Probably the most controversial portion of the policy is that employees are not allowed to smoke in their own vehicles even if they are not on Sarah Bush property if they are on the clock for Sarah Bush.
On the surface this sounds extreme. Again, I am not sure how it will be enforced. But they are basically saying is that if you are on our time, you will not smoke. We are not paying our employees to smoke. When I look at it that way, I don’t see it as so controversial.
As I’ve said before, I am not a fan of smoking, but I am not a fan anti-smoking law either; though I wouldn’t fight against one. But this is a company policy, not a government imposed law. I have said in the past, the place to take the no-smoking argument is to the private business, owner, or company; not the government. Let the individual company decide how they want to run their business. Sarah Bush is a private company setting policy for their employees. If the employees don’t like it, they can search elsewhere for a job.
One under-reported portion of this policy is that SBL is offering its employees assistance in quitting smoking. This seems to be helping ease the extreme non-smoking policy. From what I’ve heard, these incentives go far beyond moral support and group therapy. It is a real financial benefit for the employee.
I am sure there is a financial benefit in it for Sarah Bush as well. The fewer smokers on the payroll, the less health insurance costs are to the company. That savings is shared by both the employees with their health insurance match and the patients in the possibility of lower charges.
A hospital is supposed to be a clean place. When its employees smell like ashtrays, it really detracts from the clean image. I think that is one of the goals of this policy. Again, I don’t see how they will be able to truly enforce every aspect of the rule. But it is a step in the right direction.
